Liberal justices say Trump immunity decision 'will have disastrous consequences' for the U.S. (2024)

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court's liberal bloc issued blistering dissents Monday in the Trump immunity ruling, arguing that it "reshapes the institution of the presidency" and "makes a mockery" of the constitutional principle that no man is above the law.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, reading her dissent from the bench, said that "relying on little more than its own misguided wisdom ... the Court gives former President Trump all the immunity he asked for and more."

She added that "because our Constitution does not shield a former President from answering for criminal and treasonous acts, I dissent."

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on ideological lines that former President Donald Trump has immunity for some of his conduct as president but not unofficial acts in the federal election interference case. The court did not determine what constitutes an "official" act in this case, leaving that to the lower court.

Follow live updates on the Trump immunity hearing

The decision adds another hurdle and further delay to special counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of the former president. Trump was indicted last year on charges he conspired to "overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election."

Sotomayor said that the majority opinion, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, invents "an atextual, ahistorical, and unjustifiable immunity that puts the President above the law."

Their ruling, she went on, makes three moves that she said "completely insulate Presidents from criminal liability." Sotomayor said the court creates absolute immunity for the president's exercise of "core constitutional powers," creates "expansive immunity for all 'official acts,'" and "declares that evidence concerning acts for which the President is immune can play no role in any criminal prosecution against him."

Sotomayor warned that the ruling "will have disastrous consequences for the Presidency and for our democracy" and that it sends the message: “Let the President violate the law, let him exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, let him use his official power for evil ends.”

She added, “Even if these nightmare scenarios never play out, and I pray they never do, the damage has been done. The relationship between the President and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably. In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law.”

In her own written dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said that the majority's ruling "breaks new and dangerous ground."

"Departing from the traditional model of individual accountability, the majority has concocted something entirely different: a Presidential accountability model that creates immunity—an exemption from criminal law — applicable only to the most powerful official in our Government," she wrote.

Jackson warned that under the majority's "new Presidential accountability mode," a hypothetical president "who admits to having ordered the assassinations of his political rivals or critics...or one who indisputably instigates an unsuccessful coup...has a fair shot at getting immunity."

The chief justice dismissed the dissents, suggesting that his three liberal colleagues had misinterpreted the majority's opinion and were engaging in "fear mongering." Roberts argued that they "strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the Court actually does today." He wrote that "like everyone else, the President is subject to prosecution in his unofficial capacity."

He also appeared to scoff at Sotomayor for what she included in her dissent, saying that her "most compelling piece of evidence consists of excerpted statements of Charles Pinckney from an 1800 Senate debate." He continued, "But those statements reflect only the now-discredited argument that any immunity not expressly mentioned in the Constitution must not exist."

Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in a concurring opinion that she agreed with some of the majority opinion but not all of it. Notably, she said she agreed with Sotomayor that Trump’s immune conduct should still be allowed to be used as evidence in his trial.

“The Constitution does not require blinding juries to the circ*mstances surrounding conduct for which Presidents can be held liable,” she said.

Soon after the court issued the ruling, Trump celebrated the decision on his Truth Social account, writing in all caps: "Big win for our Constitution and democracy. Proud to be an American!"

A Biden campaign adviser, on the other hand, said that the ruling doesn't change what happened on Jan. 6, 2021.

"Donald Trump snapped after he lost the 2020 election and encouraged a mob to overthrow the results of a free and fair election," the adviser said. "Trump is already running for president as a convicted felon for the very same reason he sat idly by while the mob violently attacked the Capitol: he thinks he’s above the law and is willing to do anything to gain and hold onto power for himself."

Rebecca Shabad

Rebecca Shabad is a politics reporter for NBC News based in Washington.

Lawrence Hurley

,

Gabe Gutierrez

and

Daniel Barnes

contributed

.

Liberal justices say Trump immunity decision 'will have disastrous consequences' for the U.S. (2024)
Top Articles
New 2024 Subaru Outback For Sale at i.g. Burton | VIN: 4S4BTGLD7R3290607
Cassie brands Diddy 'pathetic' after his grovelling apology for assaulting her
Royal Bazaar Farmers Market Tuckernuck Drive Richmond Va
Haunted Mansion Showtimes Near Amc Classic Marion 12
Tyrones Unblocked Games Basketball Stars
Munsif Epaper Urdu Daily Online Today
Recruitment Drive/Quick guide
St Vrain Chain Gang
The Front Porch Self Service
Hillsborough County Florida Recorder Of Deeds
Ju Hua (Flos Chrysanthemi): Uses, Benefits, Side Effects, Warnings
Jordanbush Only Fans
Ge Tracker Awakener Orb
Naughty Neighbor Tumblr
Non Sequitur-exemples et définition de Non Sequitur
Juliewiththecake Wiki / Biography - Age, Boyfriend, Height, Net Worth - WikiBravo
Walgreens Dupont Tonkel
Spanish Flower Names: 150+ Flowers in Spanish
Yellow Kitchen Curtains Walmart
Ebony Pyt Twerk
LeBron Glazing Poem / Boy Oh Boy, Where Do I Even Begin?
Cocaine Bear Showtimes Near Amc Braintree 10
Craigs List Plattsburgh Ny
Guide:How to make WvW Legendary Armor
Amex Platinum Cardholders: Get Up to 10¢ Off Each Gallon of Gas via Walmart Plus Gas Discount
Spiral Roll Unblocked Games Premium
A 100% Honest Review of M. Gemi Shoes — The Laurie Loo
Walgreens Pharmacy On Jennings Station Road
SF bay area cars & trucks "chevrolet 50" - craigslist
Monroe County Incidents
Kostenlose Karneval Google Slides Themen & PowerPoint Vorlage
Pokemon TCG: Best Japanese Card Sets
Bella Isabella 1425
Wisconsin Volleyball Team Leaked Pictures And Videos
Fallen Avatar Mythic Solo
Pixel Run 3D Unblocked
Spearmint Rhino Coi Roll Call
Nz Herald Obituary Notices
Alger Grade Ohm
Busted Magazine Columbus Ohio
Exploring The Craigslist Washington DC Marketplace - A Complete Overview
Benson Downs Resident Portal
Desi Cinemas.com
Footfetish Telegram
Thekat103.7
Hit Entertainment Wiki
Gary Zerola Net Worth
University Of Oregon Id
Mcknet Workday
Physician Dressed As A Sorceress Crossword Clue
Markella Magliola Obituary
Pnp Telegram Group
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Otha Schamberger

Last Updated:

Views: 5592

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Otha Schamberger

Birthday: 1999-08-15

Address: Suite 490 606 Hammes Ferry, Carterhaven, IL 62290

Phone: +8557035444877

Job: Forward IT Agent

Hobby: Fishing, Flying, Jewelry making, Digital arts, Sand art, Parkour, tabletop games

Introduction: My name is Otha Schamberger, I am a vast, good, healthy, cheerful, energetic, gorgeous, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.